Polish Briefing

Polish Briefing: Gazprom’s complaint on the Stockholm arbitration is injustified, says PGNiG

What goes on in Poland on the 16th of July.

Gazprom’s complaint on the Stockholm arbitration is injustified, says PGNiG

After receiving a copy of Gazprom’s complaint to set aside the final judgment of the Arbitration Tribunal in Stockholm in the arbitration proceedings concerning the reduction of the contract price for gas supplied under the Yamal contract, PGNiG upholds its earlier position, according to which there are no reasons to set aside the court’s judgment .

PGNiG informed that the Court of Appeal in Stockholm served on the company a copy of Gazprom’s complaint to reverse the final judgment of March 30, 2020, issued by the Arbitration Tribunal in Stockholm in arbitration proceedings brought by PGNiG against Gazprom, concerning a reduction in the contract price for gas supplied by Gazprom on the basis of the Yamal contract.

Having received a copy of Gazprom’s complaint, the company maintains its position that there are no grounds for revoking the final judgment of the Stockholm Arbitration Tribunal. – In the course of the proceedings before the Court of Appeal in Stockholm, the company will seek to dismiss Gazprom’s complaint as it is unfounded – the company states in the report.


Releated articles

Orlen has launched a program to help flood victims

Orlen Group has launched a special program called “We are together,” to which it has so far donated 35 million...
Naftoport in Gdańsk. Picture by Bartłomiej Sawicki/BiznesAlert.pl

Poland wants the EU to coordinate the protection of infrastructure that delivers non-Russian fuels

During the EU Energy Council, Minister Henning-Kloska stressed the importance of infrastructure that delivers non-Russian fuels. The politician said that...
A tanker. Picture by Wikimedia Commons

Polish Briefing: Russian tanker stuck in Baltic I China will fuel Poland’s e-cars and concerns I Poland’s first collective prosumer

What goes in Poland on 7th of August.

Share:

Facebook X X X